Job Descriptions Should Define the Work Ahead

By: Cris Soronio

job descriptions should define the work.

A job description can remain unchanged for years while the position itself keeps moving. That is especially common in swine and poultry live production. Operations expand, reporting relationships shift, production systems change, and managers take on responsibilities that were never part of the original role. The title may still be accurate, but the document underneath it can gradually fall behind.

Recruiting from that version creates problems early. Candidates read one description before applying, then hear different expectations during interviews. Hiring managers begin evaluating people for responsibilities that were never included in the posting. A recruiter may also spend time searching for qualifications that no longer carry the same importance they once did.

Before a search opens, the written description should be compared with the work the person will actually be asked to do.

Start With the Role as It Exists Today

A review does not need to become a complete rewrite.

For a live production position, look at the scope of the operation first. Has the number of farms or facilities changed? Is there more travel between sites? Have staffing responsibilities increased? Does the position now require closer coordination with animal health, feed, transportation, technical, or operations teams? Those details affect the person who will be successful in the role.

Responsibilities also accumulate over time. A manager takes ownership of an additional process because someone needs to handle it. A new reporting requirement becomes permanent. Another expectation gets added after an operational change.

Eventually, a job description can contain duties that no longer belong together or give equal weight to responsibilities that are very different in importance.

Reviewing the role before recruiting begins gives the hiring team a chance to decide what deserves attention now.

Be Clear About the Work Candidates Are Accepting

Candidates need enough information to understand the opportunity realistically.

In live production, that includes the parts of the job that may be demanding. Frequent travel between farms should be discussed. On-call or weekend responsibilities should be clear. If the new employee will enter an operation with staffing needs, ongoing production issues, or projects that require immediate attention, those circumstances belong in the interview conversation.

Candidates can make better decisions when they understand the conditions surrounding the role. This also gives hiring managers a better interview. Instead of asking broad questions about leadership or adaptability, they can discuss responsibilities the candidate would actually encounter and learn how that person has handled comparable situations before.

Important details should not first appear during onboarding.

Define What the First Year Should Accomplish

Before interviews begin, I encourage hiring teams to agree on what they expect from the person after twelve months.

The answer should be specific to the operation. A production manager may need to improve communication between farms and the broader operations team. Another position could carry responsibility for employee development, greater consistency across locations, or stronger coordination with veterinarians and technical staff.

Those priorities should shape the interview. Candidates can then be asked about relevant decisions they have made, how they approached similar responsibilities, and what happened afterward. The conversation becomes more useful than simply confirming job titles or years of experience.

First-year expectations also create continuity after the hire. Managers have a clearer starting point for onboarding and coaching because the priorities were established before the employee arrived.

Separate Essential Qualifications From Preferences

Hiring profiles tend to grow as more people become involved in a search.

A certain production background may be preferred. Specific leadership experience gets added. Familiarity with one system or customer group starts to feel essential because the previous employee had it.

Each request can have a reasonable basis. The full combination may still create a candidate profile that is unnecessarily narrow.

Hiring teams should identify the experience someone genuinely needs on day one and the knowledge that can develop after joining the organization. That decision does not reduce expectations for the role. It gives recruiters a clearer search and helps interviewers concentrate on qualifications that have a direct connection to the work.

Make Sure Everyone Is Describing the Same Position

Internal differences become obvious to candidates.

HR may provide one description. The direct manager may emphasize operational responsibilities that barely appear in it. Senior leadership may see the hire as part of a longer-term succession or growth plan. Candidates should not have to determine which version carries the most weight.

Before interviews start, everyone involved should understand the major responsibilities, reporting relationships, working conditions, and first-year priorities. Interviewers do not need identical scripts. They do need a common understanding of the position they are evaluating candidates for. That alignment also makes candidate comparisons more useful because the criteria do not keep changing as the search progresses.

The Job Description Still Matters After Someone Starts

A current job description can support onboarding and early performance discussions.

The new employee already has a reference point for responsibilities and priorities. The manager can build coaching conversations around expectations that were discussed throughout recruiting. When the actual position is significantly different from what was presented, the first few months can become an exercise in correcting misunderstandings.

Some retention problems that appear later may have started with unclear expectations before the employee ever accepted the offer.

For live production employers, that makes the job description more than a document used to open a requisition. It becomes part of the information people use to decide whether the opportunity makes sense for them.

Final Thoughts

Before launching the next swine or poultry live production search, compare the current job description with the position as it operates today.

Look closely at responsibilities that have changed, expectations that have been added, and qualifications that may no longer deserve the same weight. A short review at the beginning can give recruiters better direction and candidates a more accurate understanding of the work ahead.

If you would like to compare notes on a live production role or discuss what you are seeing in the hiring market, contact Cris Soronio at cris@continentalsearch.com.

Cris Soronio

About the Author

Cris Soronio is a Recruiter with Continental Search specializing in Swine and Poultry Live Production. She partners with producers and agribusiness companies across North America to recruit production, operations, and leadership professionals while helping organizations improve hiring, onboarding, and long-term retention through practical recruiting strategies and transparent communication.

 

Cris Soronio

Recruiter – Swine and Poultry Live Production and Processing

Cris@continentalsearch.com